Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Copy/Paste Sketch Based Features in SolidWorks

Have you ever tried to save time by copying an existing
sketched based cut extrude only to find out that when you pasted this new copy
that the orientation was flipped around 180 degrees from the original?  If so, I have the background information on
why this happens and how to keep this from happening in the future.



Let’s start with a simple cut extrude feature
and notice that this seed component has been sketched on this outside surface
on my sample part.


Image-01


Next, simply click on the cut extrude feature in the
SolidWorks Feature Manager Design Tree. 
Choosing to Copy or CTRL-C, you can then paste this onto another planar
or flat surface as well as any plane in your model.  For example, I will select on the inside or
opposite face of my sample part.



Image-02



Notice how the copied cut extrude feature has been randomly
placed with the orientation flipped 180 degrees from the original.  This is because SolidWorks is controlling
this based on how the original sketch was made on the original face.  Since we are putting this on the back face,
but it was sketched on the front face first, the orientation is backwards.



Image-03


If we try this again and place the copy on the same side of
the face as the original sketch, then the result is predictable in that it
stays in the same orientation.


Image-04
Image-05


So if you are not sure why your copied sketches might be
flipping around on you, just take a quick second to see how the original sketch
was created and on what side of the surface, and you can help predict this
situation in the future.  Thank you.


Brian Reel

Computer Aided Technology, Inc.


 



Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints (FSWPC-13-#11)

(Modeling Methodology - SolidWorks Image Quality)


SolidWorks has the capability to display designs vividly with extremely high Image Quality and while this feature allows for a model with extremely high resolution, in general, they are not needed for everyday modeling. Higher Image Quality is intended to give better visual definition of very small components or components that contain very fine detail. The effect of this is a model that takes longer to calculate its visual data and a significantly larger file size. The former affects rebuild and repaint times while the latter affects model opening, closing, and saving. Both affect the amount of RAM required which amplifies the performance hit.




The best place to change the Image Quality setting is at the assembly level and selecting the option to propagate that through to all the sub-assemblies and part components as the Image Quality setting is per document. We have found that the sweet spot for this setting is around 25% up from the low end.


Also one item to note is that when you change the setting at a top level assembly it will adjust all of the part file but it will not adjust the sub-assemblies Image Quality level ony the parts in those sub-assemblies.


Note: This setting can have a larger or smaller on each users performance depending on how high their Image Quality was set.




You can by looking at our deltas see that on our Practical machine where we have enough hardware to support our model it added 15% to our benchmark. Where if we look at the Typical machine we can see that we pay the price for not having enough hardware to support our model set and it cost us almost 300% and took over 14 additional hours to run our benchmark.


Please
check back to the CATI blog as we will continue posting our
series of articles that goes further into the details of each of our tests. All
of these articles will be stored in the category of Free SolidWorks from Performance
Constraints
 and links to each with their
release date are listed below:



Thanks,


Josh
Altergott, CATI Support Manager


Adrian
Fanjoy, CATI Technical Services Director


 


 



Monday, April 29, 2013

Errors in your SolidWorks title block

Recently on support I received a call from a customer that was having an issue with errors in the SolidWorks title block. When they opened a drawing, the title block had errors in it.  Hopefully, you haven’t seen this issue before but if you have it probably looked something like this.



ScreenHunter_01 Apr. 29 11.51


So why do you get this message? A link error will appear when there is no corresponding property for the notes to link to.  To turn off those errors, go to the View menu and de-select Annotation Link Errors.



ScreenHunter_04 Apr. 29 14.21


Once you deselect “Annotation Link Errors” your drawings will look like they should and will not have error messages all over your documents.



ScreenHunter_05 Apr. 29 14.23





Friday, April 26, 2013

SolidWorks Explorer

Making changes is an integral part of the design
process.  File location and name changes
happen all the time. Often times, these changes occur in parts that have
references to other models.  When such a
change is made and this reference is not updated SolidWorks might not be able
to find the reference and that link is now broken.  In this case, you can manually update that
reference by going to file >> open >> references:



References


This is a fairly simple procedure but do it enough times and
it can become a pain.  If you have a lot
of part references to update, this method is no longer efficient.  In that case, utilize SolidWorks Explorer.  SolidWorks Explorer will carry all referenced
files while changing the name and/or location so you don’t have to worry about
this later.


 
Rename


You also have to option to update all instances where the
file being edited is used.


 
Used


 


Brian Adika, CSWP
Applications Engineer
Computer Aided Technology, Inc.



Thursday, April 25, 2013

Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints (FSWPC-13-#10)

(Modeling Methodology - SolidWorks options set to optimal)


SolidWorks, like any other advanced software application has configuration options to allow users to tailor the environment and the functionality to their needs. These options can be adjusted to provide maximum performance. There are 18 different SolidWorks System Options that were adjusted for our testing.


For a listing of all the settings please download the attached Word Doc that has images of all the SolidWorks settings highlighted that we changed from the SolidWorks default settings.




Some of these options we have set to Prompt. This allows the user to maintain control at the time SolidWorks executes one of these commands. When prompted by SolidWorks you have the option to dismiss the dialog box. If you choose to dismiss the message one of two things will happen:


The setting in the SW Options will change to be Always, or Never depending on the action taken.


The message will be moved to the Messages/Errors/Warning section of the System Options.


Either of these are bad because now SolidWorks is making a decision for you that can potentially hurt your performance, make changes to how your files are loaded, or give you results that you do not expect when performing different commands.






You can by looking at our deltas see that on our Practical machine we gained 3.6% total improvement. If we look at the Typical machine we can see that the overall improvement is a respectable 16.6% performance gain and took over 45min off of our benchmark time.


Please
check back to the CATI blog as we will continue posting our
series of articles that goes further into the details of each of our tests. All
of these articles will be stored in the category of Free SolidWorks from Performance
Constraints
 and links to each with their
release date are listed below:



Thanks,


Josh
Altergott, CATI Support Manager


Adrian
Fanjoy, CATI Technical Services Director


 


 


Please the following document for a listing of all the settings
Download 2013 Optimal Settings







Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Make: Camera Slider Project

A while
back I was speaking about the raspberry pi, a credit sized computer that
runs a Linux OS with the purpose of teaching you about programming and building
your own electrical projects with motors, sensors, and other forms of I/O. Well
I've decided to build a camera slider rig using the raspberry pi to control my
camera and motorized slider from my android phone.



Download


My first problem was cost; if this gets too expensive my wife will
kill me. I started looking on Google and aluminum channel with a slider carriage
wasn't going to be cheap. But then I heard about a company right here in
Chicago, Inventables.com. These guys had everything I needed to slider up and
going and for quite a bit cheaper then I had seen elsewhere. 



Inventables


And while I was on the site shopping I couldn't resist picking up an Arduino, which I'll talk to you about next time.


Cheers for now with photos as I go


Bob McGaughey, CSWE


Computer Aided Technology, Inc.



Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints (FSWPC-13-#9)

(Modeling Methodology - OS Visual and User Settings)


This test we can put in the category of "every little bit counts". In this category falls the visual settings from the operating system. This is one of Adrian's favorite settings and it proves that for us as engineers we should not let Microsoft control anything.


For WIN 7, these are set in the Visual Effects tab of the Performance Options Window (See instructions at bottom of article). There are four settings in this tab; Let Windows choose...., Adjust for best appearance Adjust for best performance, and custom. By default, Let Windows choose... is set and if we look at the screen shots for that and Best Appearance you can see there is no real difference between the two so what we can gather from this is that Microsoft thinks an aesthetically pleasing work environment is what is best for us. To achieve better performance, all of these options should be turned off and that is exactly what we get when we choose Adjust for best performance.








You can by looking at our deltas see that on our Practical machine where we have enough hardware to support our model we gained only 0.2% total improvement. If we look at the Typical machine we can see that the overall improvement is a respectable 16.0% performance gain and took over 45min off of our benchmark time.


Please
check back to the CATI blog as we will continue posting our
series of articles that goes further into the details of each of our tests. All
of these articles will be stored in the category of Free SolidWorks from Performance
Constraints
 and links to each with their
release date are listed below:



Thanks,


Josh
Altergott, CATI Support Manager


Adrian
Fanjoy, CATI Technical Services Director


 


 


To get to the Performance Options:


First go to Start and Right Click on Computer and select Properties




Next select Advanced system settings




Next Select the Settings in the Performance area.





Monday, April 22, 2013

How-to: SolidWorks Chamfer Single Slot Edge

By: Jim Krivoshein




Goal:


Chamfer one side of a slot. Understand why chamfers don't stop as expected.

Background:


Chamfers have an option (Tangent Propagation)similar to Fillets. Desired chamfer should only be on one edge of a slot, but achieving this result seems problematic. Turning off "Tangent Propagation" doesn't seem to help.

Setup:


A plate with a slotted hole.




Thursday, April 18, 2013

Batch process title block change

At my previous employer, we went through a very minor title block change on our SolidWorks drawings. I spent close to a month on the task of opening each file and modifying it. I now know a much faster and hands free way of accomplishing this. The design checker will allow you to check what the current sheet format of a drawing is. If the sheet format is different from the check it will change it to be correct. Fortunately the sheet format contains the title block. Not only can you change the title block but you can use task scheduler to change multiple drawings at once. Here is the process:


1, Edit your sheet format to represent the title block change and save it. (file -> save sheet format)
2, Build a check in Design Checker (tools -> design checker -> build checks)



Design checker

3, Set the drawing standard to your new template and save the design checker file



Task scheduler


4, Create a task scheduler task to run the design checker for the folder with your drawings.


Easy as that. I would recommend trying this out on a couple drawings to make sure you achieve the desired result.


Thanks,


Jordan Nardick
Applications Engineer
Computer Aided Technology, Inc. 



3D Printing Technology Day

Chances are that you may have heard about or seen 3D printing. In recent months, it has been in the news, on TV shows, and even in the President’s State of the Union Speech. 3D printing is now a mainstream technology that has found its ways into various business applications and even home use.


To learn more and to register for this event, visit http://www.cati.com/3dprinting/


We are opening our doors to anyone that would like to learn more about this cutting edge technology. Please bring your friends, children, family members, co-workers, classmates, and anyone else that would like an up close look at 3D printing technology in action. It will be fun for everyone to enjoy!


Join us at our Buffalo Grove headquarters to see Stratasys 3D printers and production systems in action. Our facility features the largest state of the art 3D Printing Lab in Illinois. Register Today!


When:
Thursday May 9, 2013
3pm-8pm 


Where:
CATI Headquarters
165 N Arlington Heights Rd, Suite 101
Buffalo Grove, IL
Get Directions 


Who Should Attend?
Anyone that would like to learn more about 3D printing technology. You don't have to be an engineer or be involved in product development to attend.


Can I Bring a Guest? If So, Who Can I Bring?
Yes, please bring a guest. Bring your friends and family. You can even bring the kids to this event.


What Will I See?
You will see the latest in professional,commercial level 3D printing and production systems from Stratasys. Some attendees could even leave with their own 3D printed part.


Register Today!

Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints (FSWPC-13-#8)

(Modeling Methodology - Files stored in an older version)


All of the tests that you will see in the upcoming articles we are shifting from hardware to modeling methodology. In all of the modeling methodology tests we change one aspect of the software and run that against our Typical and Practical machines described in our previous articles and show how much the items effect both machine types.


Our first test we are looking to see if the age of a file matters, meaning if we do not convert our files to the latest version of SolidWorks that we have installed will this effect performance.




Our dataset when given to us by the customer had files that were saved in SolidWorks 2012 and older so most of our files were not of the version we were using for testing (SW2013 SP0.0). For our test results below unfortunately Adrian lost our results for the Typical machine.




You can by looking at our deltas see that not updating all of you files to the latest version overall cost us a significant amount of time of just over 14%.


We have seen as few 1 file not saved in the latest version increase Open, Save and Rebuild times. So it is important to make sure you update all files including all libraries of purchased and standard components.


Please
check back to the CATI blog as we will continue posting our
series of articles that goes further into the details of each of our tests. All
of these articles will be stored in the category of Free SolidWorks from Performance
Constraints
 and links to each with their
release date are listed below:



Thanks,


Josh
Altergott, CATI Support Manager


Adrian
Fanjoy, CATI Technical Services Director


 


 



Wednesday, April 17, 2013

SWUGN Summit - Chicago

The
SWUGN Technical Summit
is coming to the Chicago area on Tuesday, April 30th, 2013. The SWUGN Technical
Summit is a one-day learning and networking event hosted by the SolidWorks User
Group Network and features technical presentations by local SolidWorks experts.
Two technical tracks include sessions on general SolidWorks functionality and
specialty sessions on such topics as SolidWorks Administration, Tips and
Tricks, Simulation, and Rendering. The cost for this event is only $40.00 and
includes sessions and meals.  Our very own Adrian Fanjoy and Josh Altergott will be there presenting.


Featured speakers at this event include:



  • Denny Bahl - CSUG

  • Steve Slowik and Mike
    Scola - Quest Development Group

  • Ed Eaton and Andrew
    Lowe - DiMonte Group

  • Adrian Fanjoy and Josh
    Altergott - CATI

  • Greg Jankowski and
    Richard Doyle - DS SolidWorks 


The
SWUGN Technical Summit - Chicago will be held at the
Hilton Lisle/Naperville
in Naperville, IL. Space is limited, so REGISTER NOW.
For more information and online registration CLICK
HERE.


Please
pass this message along to colleagues or other SolidWorks users that might be
interested.


REGISTER
TODAY


Jim TeDesco
Marketing Manager
Computer Aided Technology, Inc. 

How do you reference Cut List custom properties in a Solidworks drawing?

There will
be a time when you need a specific piece of information about a weldment to be
called out. Whether it’s custom properties that you create or an
existing one like Angle1, it can be linked to a note so that it
automatically changes as the part is updated.


Just as an example, I will show you how to create a custom property
that does doesn't exist by default. Starting from the weldment property
window, click on the Edit List button. Type in the property that you want to
add in the box.  I have added "test" and clicked on Add.
 Once its added you will be able to reference that property in the Cut
List.  Just follow the arrows you see in the picture below.
Capture



Let’s say this is the property that you need linked to an annotation
in the drawing.  


When you have a drawing view of the weldment, add a note as you
normally do and click the Link to Property button.  Even though this is
just a single part file, and not an assembly, you will need to select the fourth
bullet point.  By doing this the Cut List property check box will
activate. This will allow you to choose the Cut List properties and not the
part properties.  



Capture2
 


 


Ketul


 



Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints (FSWPC-13-#7c)

(Hardware Testing - Graphics Cards)


Now we reach the crux of the matter. What makes a difference in Graphics performance with SolidWorks? We discussed in our first graphics article (FSWPC-13-#7a) that while some of the graphics related functions were fairly inert other made a significant impact, either positive or negative, but these effects were fairly consistent across the spectrum of graphics card options. So still we can't tell much of a difference between a Quadro 600 and a Quadro k5000; that is until we start diving a little deeper.


In our testing we ran three models through our functional test.


The large assembly that we used for all of our testing.




A small or medium sized assembly with roughly 700 components.




A single imported complex part.




We ran each model set through the exact same benchmark 20 times. Each run isolated a different functional option (ie RealView on or off, display state options, etc…). We then combined the results of each test into a "total runtime" and began comparing results relating different model sets and different cards.


The results were somewhat counter intuitive.


Our original assumption was that the bigger the model set the more the graphics card would be taxed. Thus, the more powerful the graphics card the faster it would be.


The most interesting conclusion that we have come to is that you cannot expect an increase in graphics performance when working with very large assemblies if you buy a more expensive graphics card.




The maximum percentage improvement found with large assemblies was 1.6% between the k5000 and the others which were practically identical. We found this to be very disheartening but continuing the tests showed the positive side.


Small assemblies and parts showed a much greater tendency to improve performance when increasing graphics card power and capability.






The Small Assembly and Part Model showed that improving the graphics card capability can greatly affect the number of frames a card can paint in a given time thus improving the user experience and comfort. Our tests ran as much as 52% faster with the k5000 rather than the Quadro 600. Knowing what we know about graphics performance this potentially means far smoother graphics transitions resulting in a better user experience.


There is a threshold however. If the graphics card is already pushing out 60 frames per second; will you be able to perceive an increase to 100 frames per second? There comes a point that it does matter if the card is going faster if you don't get to experience the change due to your own natural limitations.


So it comes to a recommendation. What card will work for your needs? What we have found through our testing and through our many years of SolidWorks experience is that the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 is the best card for SolidWorks users. Realizing that going with a higher level card will not help improve the performance of Large Assemblies and the Quadro 2000 allows us to experience the same level of performance as the higher level cards do to the limitations of the human eye.


It is very important to realize that when discussing performance of graphics cards speed can be a misleading term. Our testing measured the cards' speed in painting a certain number of frames in a simulation of spinning our test models from one location to another. The faster it paints the frames the faster it reaches the final position of rotation and finishes the test. In everyday modeling life the final rotation position would be reached at the same time by every card. The performance difference would manifest itself in slower tests painting fewer frames in the given time and thus producing a "choppier" visualization of the spin.




Also, SolidWorks has some built in tools to work around slower performing cards to still allow the user to experience a smooth spin. This usually involves removal of visualization detail to allow the card to paint faster than would be possible if all of the detail remained in the model.


The last item to consider when choosing a graphics card is to think about the other programs that you are running on your machine and if they can take advantage of the GPU that a higher power graphics card can offer.


Please check back to the CATI blog as we will continue posting our series of articles that goes further into the details of each of our tests. All of these articles will be stored in the category of Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints and links to each with their release date are listed below:



Thanks,


Josh Altergott, CATI Support Manager


Adrian Fanjoy, CATI Technical Services Director



 



Free SolidWorks Certification for Subscription Service Customers

CATI's monthly contribution to the SolidWorks Blog was posted this week. This month I chose to write how to get free SolidWorks Certification Exams. The article details how customers who have an active Subscription Service Contract can access several of the certification exams that SolidWorks offers, such as the CSWP (Certified SolidWorks Professional) or CSWA (Certified SolidWorks Associate).




To view the article use the link below.


http://blogs.solidworks.com/solidworksblog/2013/04/free-solidworks-certification-for-subscription-service-customers.html


Josh Altergott



041613_2001_FreeSolidWo2


Support Manager


Computer Aided Technology, Inc.



Monday, April 15, 2013

Free SolidWorks Training - Upgrading SolidWorks Workgroup PDM to 2013

Join us on April 22, 2013 from 2pm-3:30pm Central Time for this virtual training event.  There is no cost to attend this presentation.


This is a lecture style class covering how to upgrade your SolidWorks Workgroup PDM server, web viewer, and clients.  Also, you will learn some basics regarding the Workgroup architecture and get an opportunity to ask the experts questions about your Workgroup implementation. 


Space is limited - Register NOW


The following items will be covered:



  • General review of the Workgroup PDM architecture

  • How to download the correct software components from the web

  • Preparing for your upgrade

  • How to back up your Workgroup Vault

  • Upgrade Process (Server, Client, and Web Viewer)

  • How to move the workgroup vault to a new server


When:
Monday April 22, 2013
2pm - 3:30pm Central Time 
Where:
WebEx 
Register NOW 


 


Jim TeDesco
Marketing Manager
Computer Aided Technology, Inc. 



Free breadboard design software

The other day, a customer was asking me about raspberry pi's and sharing breadboard designs with others. A good and free option is a tool from  Interaction Design Lab at the University of Applied Sciences Potsdam. Its an easy software to use and work with and there are libraries from Adafruit, one of my favorite electrical vendors in New York. Check it out.




Bob McGaughey, CSWE



Computer Aided Technology, Inc.



Thursday, April 11, 2013

How to Send Large SolidWorks Files

Customers constantly have to send SolidWorks files and other large files back and forth to each other. Many use email to do this. SolidWorks itself has the File – Send to menu to help in this process. A list of the referenced documents and their locations, the number of documents, and the combined size of the documents is displayed. But one problem that a lot see very fast is the warning: "If the size of the mail is large, it can cause transmission problems."


One quick note before I go on: What e-mail systems can be used with the SolidWorks option File - Send to?
According to SolidWorks, any e-mail system which is MAPI compliant will work with the File - Send to option. The most common example is Microsoft Outlook. If you do not have a MAPI compliant email system on your computer, the File - Send to option will not be available under the File pull down menu.


Just think of your mailbox at home. Large packages just don’t fit into the mailbox. So they have to be either left at the door or picked up at the post office. Well, the same thing can be said for electronic mail. The file size limit for most email servers is a maximum of 10MB. Some allow more and some allow less. If you try to send a SolidWorks file or zip file that exceeds the limit, the email won't go through.



Big-files



Fortunately, there a lot of free services that allow you to work around these restrictions. I did some research and found hundreds of choices. I am not sponsoring any particular program. Feel free to add a comment if you know of a good one that you like to use. I have a Dropbox account for personal use. So, that is the first one that could be used. Dropbox is very easy to use. It is free to set up an account. They give you 5GB of storage space to start. You can pay for more, but I have accumulated 50GB of free storage with their incentive emails. You can either use Dropbox.com in your Internet browser or you can install their application on your computer or mobile device. One good thing about sharing files and folder locations on Dropbox is that if a file is updated, those changes are synced and the shared file is updated automatically. That of course cannot be done with an emailed file.



If you already have a Google account, you may want to consider Google Drive. It is very similar to Dropbox. Here at CATI Support, we get very large files from customers all the time. We have a secure password protected ftp site to receive and send files. Each customer call is assigned its own support number and folder. Each folder has its own password protection to keep customer’s files safe and secure.


Neil Bucalo

Certified SolidWorks Support Technician 2013

Computer Aided Technology, Inc.



Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints (FSWPC-13-#7b)

(Hardware Testing - Graphics Cards- Hardware Comparison)


Continuing with our discussion on graphics performance with SolidWorks; in this article we will explore our analysis and findings related to comparing different levels of graphics cards.


The cards tested and compared were from NVIDIA Corporation:


From the Quadro series we tested the 600, 2000, 4000, and the k5000. Finally, we tested an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650Ti that Adrian picked up at Best Buy.





Adrian and I tested graphics cards differently than our other hardware so that we could isolate specific graphic intense functions. We also tested against three different model types; a large assembly, small assembly and a single part file with a reasonable number of features.


The following graphics intensive functions were each tested individually across all 5 NVIDIA cards:



  • 5 different display states

  • Shadows

  • RealView

  • Transparency

  • Lightweight and Large Assembly Mode

  • 5 different level of detail settings

  • 3 different Anti-Aliasing settings

  • 5 Different Image Quality Settings

  • A comparison of all of the above items set to the best possible setting vs. everything being set to the worst possible settings


This testing yielded some pretty interesting result. In this article we are going to focus on a comparison of the different levels of graphics cards and their effect on SolidWorks performance.


Many people purchasing a graphics card go in with the same assumption; more is better. The results of our efforts showed that this is not necessarily true. When running our 5 cards through 20 functionality tests each, we were able to isolate conditions where more expensive and powerful cards were effective and where they would be considered overkill.


When comparing the cards against each other and ignoring model size the only functional areas that showed significant improvement as we climbed up the chain to more and more powerful cards were Lightweight and Large Assembly Mode as well as Image Quality (when Image Quality was cranked to a level we would recommend avoiding in the first place). Every other tested function showed small improvements but not improvement to the level of most expectations.


As I said previously, taken on the whole, there seems to be no compelling reason to buy graphics cards beyond the NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and that is the card we chose put into our Practical machine. On the other hand when we delve a little deeper and look at the results comparing the different cards as they relate to different model sets we start seeing potential justification for the more powerful cards. That is the subject of our next article.




It is very important to realize that when discussing performance of graphics cards speed can be a misleading term. Our testing measured the cards' speed in painting a certain number of frames in a simulation of spinning our test models from one location to another. The faster it paints the frames the faster it reaches the final position of rotation and finishes the test. In everyday modeling life the final rotation position would be reached at the same time by every card. The performance difference would manifest itself in slower tests painting fewer frames in the given time and thus producing a "choppier" visualization of the spin.


Also, SolidWorks has some built in tools to work around slower performing cards to still allow the user to experience a smooth spin. This usually involves removal of visualization detail to allow the card to paint faster than would be possible if all of the detail remained in the model.


Please check back to the CATI blog as we will continue posting our series of articles that goes further into the details of each of our tests. All of these articles will be stored in the category of Free SolidWorks from Performance Constraints and links to each with their release date are listed below:



Thanks,


Josh Altergott, CATI Support Manager


Adrian Fanjoy, CATI Technical Services Director



 



Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Solidworks 2013 SP3.0 is now available. Log into the Solidworks customer portal to begin your download.



Network license manager with Windows Firewall – revisited

Firewalls of course help keep the bad things out, however
they can also stop other traffic that you DO want. The built in Windows
firewall is no different. By default it will not let traffic though to connect
to the SNL manager. This can be an easy fix by adding exceptions. This has been
common for quite a while.


Instructions on the Windows firewall can be see here:  http://blog.cati.com/2012/09/solidworks-snl-client-license-manager-issues-1.html


There has been an issue a number of times when the server is
either added/removed from a Domain or changed the Domain. It is not necessary for
the SNL server to be part of the Domain or on the same Domain as the clients.
The issue that may affect communication is how the firewall policies were
created. Launching the Windows Firewall with Advanced Security, you will notice
that there are 3 separate profiles that can be applied. (Only 2 if the computer
is not part of a Domain)



FW-1


Issues may arise if you add/remove the computer to the
Domain. If the server is added to a Domain, it will not have the previous
firewall rules applies to the Domain level. If it has been removed, it may not
have them applied to Public or private rule. This is obvious logical, but can
be overlooked very easily.


So if you change your server in anyway, make sure to check
the Firewall rules!



Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Need a New Liver? Print One.

Well, not quite yet. 3D printing continues to garner lots of press and attention. It truly has become a way to leverage 3D data generated from many different sources. The medical product industry has embraced additive manufacturing and continues to find new applications for the tool.


A corollary use for 3D printing applies to surgical simulation. For example, training surgeons in the use of new medical tools using 3D printed organs instead of a patient. The following article from the Wall Street Journal details this approach. Enjoy.


-Rich Werneth
Computer Aided Technology, Inc.




3-D
Printing Is Ready for Surgery


Surgeons Practice With Replicas of
Patients' Organs Before Surgery
 


By JURO OSAWA



Maki
Sugimoto


Japanese surgeon Maki Sugimoto holds a 3-D replica of a
patient's liver built by printers using acrylic resin.


Surgeons at a hospital in Japan recently faced a
dilemma before transplanting a parent's liver into a child: How exactly to trim
the organ to fit the space in the child's smaller cavity while preserving its
functions.


So they took a knife to a three-dimensional replica
of the donor's liver built by a machine that resembles an office printer. The
model helped the doctors figure out where to carve it, leading to a successful
transplant last month.


Surgeons are finding industrial 3-D printers to be
a lifesaver on the operating table. This technology, also known as additive
manufacturing, has long produced prototypes of jewelry, electronics and car
parts. But now these industrial printers are able to construct personalized
copies of livers and kidneys, one ultrathin layer at a time.


The medical field in particular is expected to
benefit greatly from 3-D printing. Scientists are working on ways to print
embryonic stem cells and living human tissue with the aim to produce body parts
that can be directly attached to or implanted in the body.


 


image


Maki
Sugimoto


A 3-D replica of a patient's liver.


Printing out artificial body parts is likely many
years away, but advanced 3-D printers are starting to make their mark at
hospitals.


Two of the world's largest industrial 3-D printer
makers, U.S. companies Stratasys Ltd. and 3D Systems Corp., offer machines that can replicate human organs.


Using medical images such as CT scans, these
printers can construct translucent models made with variations of acrylic
resin, enabling surgeons to understand the internal structure of the livers and
kidneys, such as the direction of blood vessels or the exact location of a
tumor.


A more realistic-looking model, made partly of
polyvinyl alcohol, assimilates the wetness and texture of a real human liver,
making it more suitable to cut with a surgical knife.


It usually takes several hours to a half day to
print a copy of a human organ depending on its size. The whole process,
including the time to convert the original medical images to printable 3-D
data, usually takes a few days.


"Today, most medical uses [of 3-D printers]
are still experimental, but we are seeing more and more applications,"
said David Reis, chief executive of Stratasys, based in Eden Prairie, Minn.


There are many hurdles, to be sure, before the
technology can become widespread in operating rooms at hospitals world-wide.
The kinds of advanced 3-D printers used to create organ models can cost between
$250,000 to $500,000, making it difficult for smaller hospitals to install
them.


As most doctors don't know how to use those
printers, hospitals need engineers to operate the printers and help convert
images from computed tomography and other medical equipment to 3-D data that
can be printed out.


Maki Sugimoto, a surgeon at Japan's Kobe
University Hospital who began using replicas of patients' organs for navigation
purposes in 2011, employs Japanese company Fasotec Co. to produce the 3-D
models. Fasotec acts as an intermediary between the hospitals and printers.


Fasotec says it is still rare for surgeons to
request 3-D replicas of internal organs—more typical are basic 3-D copies of
bones.


At Hong Kong's Dental Implant & Maxillofacial
Centre, oral surgeons have been using 3-D printers for a few years to create
not only a copy of the patient's jaw to plan surgeries, but also a custom-made
surgery template that can be placed inside the patient's mouth during the
operation so the doctor knows exactly where to insert implants.


Efforts to promote 3-D printing for surgical
purposes come at a time when the technology is evolving faster, drawing renewed
attention in the media and generating buzz among consumers world-wide.


While 3-D printing has existed for about 30 years,
the rapid progress in technology in recent years, as well as more affordable
price tags, has made the technology more attractive to industries and
consumers.


In the U.S., some universities and corporate
laboratories are conducting research on "bioprinting," or artificial
construction of body parts using living human tissue. Still in the experimental
phase, researchers hope one day to produce personalized body parts on demand,
despite many hurdles including ethical questions.


Mr. Sugimoto believes that longer-term, the
technology could help younger, less experienced surgeons practice with accurate
copies before surgery.


If doctors feel more confident about the surgeries
they are about to perform, patients will feel more comfortable, Mr. Sugimoto
said.


"The potential impact is no smaller than the
shift from fixed-line phones to mobile phones," he said.


Write to Juro Osawa at juro.osawa@wsj.com


Corrections & Amplifications 


The
photos above were taken by Maki Sugimoto. A previous version of this article
credited Kobe University Hospital for the photos.


A version of this article
appeared April 9, 2013, on page B5 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street
Journal, with the headline: 3-D Printing, Under the Knife.