When running simulations, mesh density is important. Coarser meshes solve faster but are less
accurate; while finer meshes are the opposite, slow but accurate. While one way to reach the middle ground is to
have the density right in the middle, a more accurate way would be to use mesh
control. Stress concentrations most commonly
occur along edges, especially sharp edges.
On edges and other areas where accuracy is important, mesh control is a
great way to keep that accuracy while keeping time down as well. To demonstrate this, a tensile test was
simulated with a notch cut into it.
Simulations were then completed in mesh densities of coarse,
in the middle, and fine with simulation time, mesh element size, and maximum
stress were measured.
Coarse
In the Middle
Fine
Mesh Size | Time | Max Element Size | Max Stress |
Course | >1 | 10.06 mm | 433.2 |
Regular | 4 sec | 5.03 mm | 469.1 |
Fine | 54 sec | 2.52 mm | 479.9 |
Once these simulations were complete, three simulations were
done using mesh control on the notch using a regular mesh size for the rest of
the part.
Mesh Control 2
Mesh Control 3
Mesh Size | Time | Mesh Control Size | Max Stress |
Mesh Control 1 | 4 sec | 2.52 mm | 571 MPa |
Mesh Control 2 | 5 sec | 1 | 693.8 MPa |
Mesh Control 3 | 115 sec | .05 mm | 33205 |
In the first instance of using mesh control, with the mesh
control size being equal to the fine max element size, the stress found was
very accurate, coming close to that found in previous tests. As the mesh control size was decreased
however, a new problem
developed. The stress found grew at an
alarming rate. The yield strength of
this material is 620.4 MPa. According to
the studies done with mesh control, the part breaks easily while in all
actuality does not.
Mesh control is an invaluable tool in being accurate and
saving time. It is important however to
not try and refine the mesh too much, or else the entire simulation will be
rendered useless.
Chad Whitbeck - Applications Engineer
Computer Aided Technology Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment